How Are Assets Divided in Michigan During a Divorce?

By Beverly Bird

In community property states, the law demands that courts divide marital property 50/50 when couples divorce. In equitable distribution states, judges may stray from a 50/50 split when they believe circumstances warrant it. Michigan is an equitable distribution state, but judges typically divide assets fairly evenly. Courts will order a more disproportionate division, for example, more than 60/40, only in extreme situations. If you don't want to leave it up to a judge, Michigan allows spouses to reach their own agreement and submit it to the court. Judges will generally honor a couple's wishes regarding property distribution unless their pact is egregiously unfair to one spouse or the other.

In community property states, the law demands that courts divide marital property 50/50 when couples divorce. In equitable distribution states, judges may stray from a 50/50 split when they believe circumstances warrant it. Michigan is an equitable distribution state, but judges typically divide assets fairly evenly. Courts will order a more disproportionate division, for example, more than 60/40, only in extreme situations. If you don't want to leave it up to a judge, Michigan allows spouses to reach their own agreement and submit it to the court. Judges will generally honor a couple's wishes regarding property distribution unless their pact is egregiously unfair to one spouse or the other.

Equitable Distribution Factors

Michigan is a no-fault state so spouses can’t file for divorce on any grounds other than the breakdown of the marriage, but when it comes to dividing property, judges may consider what caused the marriage to break down. The concept of equitable distribution allows courts to weigh certain factors when deciding if a 50/50 division of marital assets is appropriate and Michigan is one of a few states that will consider marital fault. If one spouse has ended the marriage by committing adultery or abusing the other, it would not be equitable to reward him with additional marital property in a divorce, depriving the innocent spouse of a 50 percent share. Michigan judges also consider which spouse contributed more income to the acquisition of marital assets. The spouse who contributed more income might deserve more than a half share of the property because his labor made its purchase possible.

Divorce is never easy, but we can help. Learn More

Income Vs. Household Labor

The issue of which spouse contributed more financially to the acquisition of marital assets can be tricky in Michigan, especially in long-term marriages. Michigan law acknowledges that “reliance on the marriage” may cause a spouse to sacrifice career opportunities in favor of remaining out of the workforce to care for the couple’s home and family. The stay-at-home spouse might have less earning potential and would therefore contribute less financially to the purchase of marital assets. However, courts usually won’t penalize her because of this, depriving her of a fair share of marital property when the marriage ends. She may even receive more than 50 percent, because she’s not likely to be able to learn job skills post-divorce to replace property as easily as her spouse might. However, exceptions exist. In short-term marriages where one spouse elects not to work because the other earns sufficient income to support them, her household contributions probably would not factor into asset division. Courts strive to return each spouse to his or her premarital financial condition after short marriages, assigning each of them the property they brought into the marriage and dividing everything else evenly.

Property as Spousal Support

In divorces where one spouse is unlikely to be able to support a lifestyle comparable to what she enjoyed during the marriage, Michigan courts may award her more property in lieu of spousal support. For example, she may receive the marital home because it’s unreasonable to expect her to pursue a career after 25 years of marriage if she rarely or ever worked -- she would be unlikely to earn enough to replace that home. A judge might give her the property, even if this means that she’ll receive 55 percent or 60 percent of the total value of the couple’s assets overall. This usually occurs when the other spouse has an active career and is more likely to be able to purchase or lease suitable accommodations of his own.

Transmutation of Separate Property

Normally, Michigan law protects a spouse’s separately owned property from distribution in divorce. However, when a separately owned asset appreciates in value over the years, some judges will divide the appreciation in a divorce. This is especially true when transmutation has occurred, such as when one spouse contributed “sweat equity” to a home owned by the other before the marriage. This typically occurs when a spouse helped to maintain or improve the property over the years and her labor likely contributed to its increase in value. This transitions the separate property into marital property. Michigan courts will generally reward her for her efforts by giving her a share of the asset's increased equity.

Divorce is never easy, but we can help. Learn More
Dividing Income and Household Labor for Divorce

References

Related articles

What Are the Elements of Dissipation of Assets in a Divorce in Florida?

Some people take “divorce planning” to an extreme. It’s one thing for a spouse to begin collecting copies of financial documents because he knows he’s going to need them when he files for divorce. It’s something else entirely if he begins transferring assets out of the marital estate so a court can’t award half of them to his partner. The marital estate is everything spouses acquire together while they’re married. Whether a spouse dissipates these assets intentionally, or whether he spends marital money on his paramour in the course of having an extramarital affair, divorce courts in Florida take a dim view of it.

Does a Spouse Receive Alimony When Divorced in Ohio?

Spouses can receive alimony during or after a divorce in Ohio, but it’s not an automatic right. Judges make alimony decisions on a case-by-case basis and after considering numerous factors. Section 3105.18 of the Ohio Revised Code lists these factors, but it doesn’t instruct a judge how to weigh them. Ultimately, it comes down to the opinion of the judge whether to award alimony and for how long.

Does a Spouse Get Increased Value in an Inherited Home in Divorce?

There are few black-and-white answers when it comes to inherited property in divorce. An inherited asset starts out belonging solely to the spouse who received it, and it may remain that way – or it may not. It depends on what you do with it between the date you receive it and the time your marriage ends. If it appreciates in value, this is an additional factor the court must consider -- the question becomes why its value went up. Depending on the answer, the increase might be yours, or you might have to share it with your spouse.

Get Divorced Online

Related articles

New York Divorce Laws on Property Distribution With the Length of Marriage

New York is an equitable distribution state so there are no hard-and-fast rules dictating how courts will distribute ...

Mississippi Divorce Laws on Equitable Distribution

Mississippi divorce law changed significantly in 1994, when the Supreme Court handed down two important decisions in ...

Divorce & Equitable Distribution

If you and your spouse are facing divorce, you know the court is going to divide up the assets and debts you've ...

Distribution of Marital Property in a Final Divorce Decree in Virginia

Property division in divorce can be difficult to understand in equitable distribution states because there are few hard ...

Browse by category