Does a Breach of License Equal a Copyright Infringement?

by David Carnes

    A copyright license is an arrangement between a copyright holder and a user, allowing the user limited use of the copyrighted material. In most cases, the user is required to pay royalties to the copyright holder. Copyright infringement refers to the use of copyrighted material without the copyright holder's consent. Copyright infringement is based on federal copyright law, while breach of a copyright license agreement is based on state contract law.

    Copyright Infringement

    A copyright is essentially a legal monopoly on the right to perform, publicly display, distribute, reproduce and adapt a copyrighted work. Normally, a copyright is held by the author of the work, although he may assign or license his copyright to another party. Infringement occurs when a third party uses copyrighted material in such a way that it violates the previously mentioned rights, without the permission of the copyright holder. Even the author of a work can be sued for copyright infringement if he assigns his copyright to someone else, such as a publishing company, and then proceeds to use the work without the publisher's permission.

    Copyright License Agreements

    A copyright license agreement is a bargained-for agreement between a copyright holder and a party seeking to use copyrighted material. Such agreements often strictly limit the use of the material in question; for example, the user may be prohibited from adapting the material or distributing it. The copyright holder may demand a percentage of the user's sales revenue or a flat fee if the work is non-commercial. The license agreement may also stipulate other limitations on how the copyrighted material may be used.

    Breaches and Infringement

    Whether breach of a copyright license agreement constitutes copyright infringement depends on the nature of the breach. If the user defaults on the payment of royalties, for example, the copyright holder is entitled to cancel the agreement and sue for damages under contract law. Use of the copyrighted material within the scope of the agreement does not constitute infringement until after the copyright holder notifies the user that the agreement has been canceled. On the other hand, if the user utilizes the copyrighted work in a manner not authorized by the licensing agreement – such as adapting the work by translating it into another language – this use breaches the agreement and also constitutes copyright infringement. If the copyright holder registered his work with the U.S. Copyright Office prior to the infringing act or within three months of first publication, he can sue the user for statutory damages of up to $150,000 per act, and no proof of actual damages is required.

    Free Copyright Licenses

    A free copyright license is not a binding contract because it does not require the user to provide the copyright holder with anything of value in exchange for the use of the copyrighted material. Since the license is not a contract, any use of the copyrighted material outside the scope of the license agreement constitutes copyright infringement.

    About the Author

    David Carnes has been a full-time writer since 1998 and has published two full-length novels. He spends much of his time in various Asian countries and is fluent in Mandarin Chinese. He earned a Juris Doctorate from the University of Kentucky College of Law.

    Photo Credits

    • Jupiterimages/Photos.com/Getty Images