Pennsylvania Case Law on Custodial Parent Relocation

By Heather Frances J.D.

Ex-spouses often move after their custody order or divorce decree is final, but a Pennsylvania parent can object if the custodial parent wants to relocate with the couple’s children. Pennsylvania’s courts consult case law when deciding whether a custodial parent is allowed to move with his children. Ultimately, the court wants to be sure the relocation is in the child’s best interests.

Ex-spouses often move after their custody order or divorce decree is final, but a Pennsylvania parent can object if the custodial parent wants to relocate with the couple’s children. Pennsylvania’s courts consult case law when deciding whether a custodial parent is allowed to move with his children. Ultimately, the court wants to be sure the relocation is in the child’s best interests.

Relocation Notice

Under Pennsylvania law, a parent wishing to move must give formal notice to the other parent when he intends to relocate in a way that significantly impairs the non-moving parent’s custodial rights. In the case of C.M.K. v. K.E.M. (2012), Pennsylvania’s Superior Court decided a parent could file this notice even if he did not believe the move was a relocation that required notice. This allows parents to file notices as a precautionary measure -- just in case the move is later considered to be a relocation -- and enable parents to subsequently explain, if it becomes necessary, why the move is not a relocation.

Get a free, confidential bankruptcy evaluation. Learn More

Gruber v. Gruber

One of the fundamental cases addressing relocation in Pennsylvania is Gruber v. Gruber (1990), which established three factors a Pennsylvania court must consider when determining whether to allow a custodial parent to relocate a significant distance away with children. These factors are: (1) the potential advantages of the proposed move and likelihood the relocation will substantially improve the life of the custodial parent and child as well as whether the move is the result of a momentary whim by the custodial parent; (2) the integrity of both parents' motives - for the move and opposing the move; and (3) whether there are alternative custody or visitation arrangements that can be made that will foster an ongoing relationship between the child and noncustodial parent.

Best Interests

In the case of Speck v. Spadafore (2006), Pennsylvania’s Superior Court determined that the most important consideration in relocation issues is the best interests of the child. In this case, the child’s mother wanted to relocate to marry her fiancé, taking the child with her. Evidence showed the child had a very close relationship with his father and extended family that also lived nearby. The Superior Court determined the lower court wrongly allowed the mother to relocate with the child, since it was clear that the relocation was in the mother’s best interests, but not in the best interests of the child.

Financial Interests

Pennsylvania courts can consider a child’s financial status when determining whether a move is in his best interests. In Boyer v. Schake (2002), the court allowed the mother to relocate with the child because the relocation was in the mother’s financial best interest and, by extension, in the child’s best interests. On the other hand, in Ketterer v. Seifert (2006), the court did not allow the mother to relocate to California with the child because she could not prove the move would substantially improve the family’s financial circumstances.

Get a free, confidential bankruptcy evaluation. Learn More
Pennsylvania State Regulations About Proximity of Parents to Children in Divorce

References

Related articles

Ohio Laws on Relocation & Child Custody After Divorce

Under Ohio law, a custodial parent wishing to relocate to a difference state must receive consent from the other parent or the court. As a result of this requirement, you cannot just pick up and relocate to another state with your child. There are requirements, as required by Ohio law, that you must meet before the move may occur or the court may intervene and order you and your child back to Ohio.

Illinios Custody Laws

Because custody proceedings are emotionally charged and involve high stakes, they can be particularly nasty. Illinois has established several laws to help determine custody and mitigate the damage a legal battle can cause to children. Illinois was one of the first states to abolish gender preferences in custody proceedings, meaning parents have equal rights to their children.

Legal Paternity Rights

With genetic tests now available to establish a child’s biological father with medical certainty, courts have more evidence to consider in paternity cases. However, state laws, which vary on paternity issues, often limit who may establish a paternal relationship with a child since this could be disruptive for the child. Current paternity laws balance the rights of parents and children regarding this difficult emotional and financial topic.

Related articles

Parental Custody Rights When Moving Out of the State of PA

The issue of parental relocation is one of the most emotionally charged in custody law. No matter which way a court ...

What Do They Look for in Custody Cases in Pennsylvania?

Pennsylvania revamped its child custody laws effective January 2011. Historically, like other states, Pennsylvania ...

Divorce Law in Virginia & Taking Minor Children Out of State

With the breakup of a marriage, it may become necessary to move the children out of state. This common issue often ...

If You Get Divorced in Georgia Can You Move to a Different State With Your Kids?

Before 2003, Georgia was one of the more lenient states when allowing a custodial parent to move away or relocate with ...

Browse by category