Legality of a Parody of a Trade Name

By Rachel Moran

A trademark is a brand name that identifies the source of particular goods. Whether or not a trade name is registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office, a business has a trademark in its trade name because its name identifies the company as the source for a particular set of goods. Parodies are usually protected from trademark lawsuits because they are critical representations of or jokes about a trade name. Since a parody is obviously not the source of a certain product or service, it usually isn't infringing trademark rights.

A trademark is a brand name that identifies the source of particular goods. Whether or not a trade name is registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office, a business has a trademark in its trade name because its name identifies the company as the source for a particular set of goods. Parodies are usually protected from trademark lawsuits because they are critical representations of or jokes about a trade name. Since a parody is obviously not the source of a certain product or service, it usually isn't infringing trademark rights.

Confusion

Clarity matters in parody. If there's a chance the public could confuse the source of goods, there's a chance the parody is a trademark infringement. For example, LL Bean lost a case against a sex magazine that parodied its catalog in a photo spread because at the time, it was unlikely someone would consider LL Bean as having created, or been a part of creating, the spread.

Protect your brand. Register My Trademark Now

Commerce

Commercial gain is likely to undermine a legal defense of parody. A trade name exists for commercial purposes, so attempting a parody for commercial purposes might infringe on trademark rights. Contrary to the LL Bean case, Gucchi Goo, a purse company, was found to have violated a trademark because their alleged parodies of Gucci handbags were a commercial venture, with products similar enough to Gucci's to create confusion as to who designed the bags.

First Amendment

Some judges believe the First Amendment trumps everything. Expressive freedom is one of our fundamental rights, so a parody that serves a genuinely critical function may be protected. For instance, a federal judge in Atlanta decided a man who runs the site Walocaust.com, a parody of WalMart's labor policies, has a First Amendment right to express his criticism that trumps WalMart's claim of trademark violation. Judges may balance the rights protected by the First Amendment with the likelihood of confusion created by a parody.

Actual Harm

Even though trademark infringement is usually decided by the likelihood of confusion to result, if no harm occurs, courts may favor the parody, regardless of how the trade name's use affects the public's understanding of the name as the source of a certain product. For example, Hormel, makers of SPAM, wanted to block the sale of certain merchandise for a Jim Henson movie that included a pig named SPA'AM. The movie character was allegedly "grotesque" and "evil," but the judge decided that he was, at worst, "untidy" and that parodies of Hormel's pork product were widespread enough in entertainment that there was no harm in this instance.

Reputation

Parodies that include drugs or are part of pornography may come under closer scrutiny because of social values. The Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders prevailed against the owners of the pornographic film, "Debbie Does Dallas," because of the movie's depiction of the cheerleading squad in such a squalid manner. The parody used strong enough content that it was likely to affect the perception of the Cowboy Cheerleaders.

Protect your brand. Register My Trademark Now
Can I Record Someone Else's Song and Change the Words in Parody Law?

References

Resources

Related articles

How to Identify a Trademark

According to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, a trademark is essentially the same thing as a brand name. It may consist of a word, phrase, symbol or any combination thereof to establish an association between the mark and a particular product, service or celebrity. In effect, it helps the consumer distinguish one manufacturer from another. Because a trademark is unique by design or suggestion, it stands apart from generic words and symbols, making it easy to identify.

Fair Use Exceptions to Copyright Law

Under the copyright law, the creator of the original work is known as its author. U.S. Copyright law provides authors the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, perform, display, and prepare derivative works of their original expression in a tangible medium. The fair use doctrine limits these rights, and acknowledges that in certain cases, the needs of the public outweigh the copyright owner’s rights. Fair use allows for certain uses of copyrighted work without license or payment to the copyright holder. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act lists four factors courts must weigh in deciding whether a use is fair.

Should Artists Trademark?

A trademark is a symbol, design, phrase, word or combination of them used by a person or business to identity and distinguish its good and services. A trademark allows an artist to protect his name or works from use by other people without his consent, but he can't trademark a mark that is already being used by someone else.

File a Trademark Online. LegalZoom. Learn More.

Related articles

Can You Use Copyrighted Photos as Sermon Illustrations?

A copyright issued by the U.S. Copyright Office protects original creative works, including literary, musical, dramatic ...

Legal Use of the Disney Characters

Walt Disney and the Disney group of companies have created some of the most memorable fictional characters in ...

Can You Copyright an Alcoholic Drink Recipe?

A copyright is a legal protection for an original work, such as a book, poem, song or piece of computer software. ...

Recipe Copyright Laws

A new recipe for apple pie can bring fame and fortune to a chef, but he still might not be able to sue other cooks who ...

Browse by category
Ready to Begin? GET STARTED