What Do They Look for in Custody Cases in Pennsylvania?

By Beverly Bird

Pennsylvania revamped its child custody laws effective January 2011. Historically, like other states, Pennsylvania based custody decisions on the best interest of the child. However, what qualified as a child's best interest was ambiguous before 2011. The state's legislation now contains more specific criteria. Judges are required to explain how they applied these factors to each case, either within a custody order or verbally in court.

Frequent Contact With Both Parents

Pennsylvania’s custody legislation, known as Act 112 of 2010, specifically states that judges must “assure a reasonable and continuing contact of the child with both parents," provided that neither parent is unfit. Judges are alert for behavior on the part of one parent that disrupts the child’s relationship with the other, such as denying visitation. Under Act 112, a parent who willfully violates the terms of a custody order is subject to criminal charges. The offense is punishable by up to six months in jail, up to six months’ probation and a possible fine of $500. A parent who actively encourages visitation and contact with the other wins favor in a custody dispute.

Disruption to the Child’s Life

The 2011 law requires Pennsylvania judges to avoid disrupting a child’s life as much as possible when parents separate. When one parent remains in the marital home, this means not forcing a child to move from that home to live with the parent who now lives elsewhere. This portion of the law also addresses moving a child to a new school district or away from his friends to satisfy a parent’s request for custody. The stability and consistency of the child's life is paramount.

Protect your loved ones. Start My Estate Plan

Parental Availability

Pennsylvania law presumes that parents are the best caregivers for their children. A parent's availability to care for a child placed in his custody will influence the court. Third-party care is often unavoidable when both parents work. However, the 2011 statute also cites ample contact with a child’s extended family. Pennsylvania courts prefer a parent with a flexible work schedule and willing family members who can step in to care for the child when he is unavailable.

Parents’ Genders

Pennsylvania’s old child custody statutes created a preference for one parent over the other based on gender. A judge might have placed a girl with her mother or a boy with his father, believing this would be in the child’s best interest. Under the 2011 statutes, judges may no longer consider parents’ genders in custody disputes.

Other Factors

In all, Pennsylvania courts must consider 16 separate criteria when deciding custody under the terms of Act 112. However, some factors may be deemed more important than others on a case-by-case basis. The 16th factor is a catch-all category for anything else a judge might think is important. Other issues judges can consider include either parent having a criminal record, including a DUI conviction. Act 112 requires a special hearing if such offenses exist.

Protect your loved ones. Start My Estate Plan
Child Custody Visitation Rights in Pennsylvania


Related articles

Who Has the Advantage in a Custody Battle?

Custody disputes in a divorce really are a lot like battles, as you line up your arsenals of evidence and testimony, then fire it all off at the judge to persuade him to rule in your favor. In one respect, this is what courts intend – at least, they don't want you heading into the fray thinking that one spouse already has an advantage over the other. Custody is decided based on the best interests of your child after the court weighs a series of factors.

Alabama Joint Custody When Parents Live Far Apart

Before 2012, Alabama law gave family law judges a considerable amount of leeway in determining what type of custody arrangements were in the best interest of the child. While the law favored joint custody, unless the parents agreed on a different arrangement, judges could consider a number of factors that might make a joint custody arrangement unfeasible. One factor was the physical location of each parent. However, when the Alabama legislature adopted the 2012 Alabama Children's Family Act, the geographical proximity of the parents was eliminated as a factor in awarding custody. Whether the 2012 Act is an improvement is a matter of debate.

California Laws on Teenage Custody Wishes

Custody determinations often have a significant impact on the life of a child. For that reason, California law provides judges with the discretion to consider a teenager's preference, if the child is capable of making a reasonable choice. Also, teenagers 14 and older may generally participate in the proceedings and offer input, regardless of whether the court ultimately considers the child's preference.

LegalZoom. Legal help is here. Start Here. Wills. Trusts. Attorney help. Wills & Trusts

Related articles

How Is Child Custody Decided In Divorce?

Every state defers to a concept called the “best interests of the child” when deciding custody issues. But different ...

Custody Laws in Kentucky

The finer points of custody can vary from state to state, but most legislation runs along common lines. Like many ...

Custody Laws for Underage Parents in Pennsylvania

In an effort to provide family court judges with clearer guidelines when making custody decisions, Pennsylvania made a ...

Child Custody Laws in the State of Tennessee for a 12-Year-Old

Establishing a custody arrangement is a required step for all divorces involving minor children. Under Tennessee law, a ...

Browse by category
Ready to Begin? GET STARTED