Pennsylvania Case Law on Custodial Parent Relocation

By Heather Frances J.D.

Ex-spouses often move after their custody order or divorce decree is final, but a Pennsylvania parent can object if the custodial parent wants to relocate with the couple’s children. Pennsylvania’s courts consult case law when deciding whether a custodial parent is allowed to move with his children. Ultimately, the court wants to be sure the relocation is in the child’s best interests.

Ex-spouses often move after their custody order or divorce decree is final, but a Pennsylvania parent can object if the custodial parent wants to relocate with the couple’s children. Pennsylvania’s courts consult case law when deciding whether a custodial parent is allowed to move with his children. Ultimately, the court wants to be sure the relocation is in the child’s best interests.

Relocation Notice

Under Pennsylvania law, a parent wishing to move must give formal notice to the other parent when he intends to relocate in a way that significantly impairs the non-moving parent’s custodial rights. In the case of C.M.K. v. K.E.M. (2012), Pennsylvania’s Superior Court decided a parent could file this notice even if he did not believe the move was a relocation that required notice. This allows parents to file notices as a precautionary measure -- just in case the move is later considered to be a relocation -- and enable parents to subsequently explain, if it becomes necessary, why the move is not a relocation.

Get a free, confidential bankruptcy evaluation. Learn More

Gruber v. Gruber

One of the fundamental cases addressing relocation in Pennsylvania is Gruber v. Gruber (1990), which established three factors a Pennsylvania court must consider when determining whether to allow a custodial parent to relocate a significant distance away with children. These factors are: (1) the potential advantages of the proposed move and likelihood the relocation will substantially improve the life of the custodial parent and child as well as whether the move is the result of a momentary whim by the custodial parent; (2) the integrity of both parents' motives - for the move and opposing the move; and (3) whether there are alternative custody or visitation arrangements that can be made that will foster an ongoing relationship between the child and noncustodial parent.

Best Interests

In the case of Speck v. Spadafore (2006), Pennsylvania’s Superior Court determined that the most important consideration in relocation issues is the best interests of the child. In this case, the child’s mother wanted to relocate to marry her fiancé, taking the child with her. Evidence showed the child had a very close relationship with his father and extended family that also lived nearby. The Superior Court determined the lower court wrongly allowed the mother to relocate with the child, since it was clear that the relocation was in the mother’s best interests, but not in the best interests of the child.

Financial Interests

Pennsylvania courts can consider a child’s financial status when determining whether a move is in his best interests. In Boyer v. Schake (2002), the court allowed the mother to relocate with the child because the relocation was in the mother’s financial best interest and, by extension, in the child’s best interests. On the other hand, in Ketterer v. Seifert (2006), the court did not allow the mother to relocate to California with the child because she could not prove the move would substantially improve the family’s financial circumstances.

Get a free, confidential bankruptcy evaluation. Learn More
Pennsylvania State Regulations About Proximity of Parents to Children in Divorce

References

Related articles

Child Custody & State Lines in Indiana

Your divorce court distributed custody of your children based on your family’s circumstances at the time of your divorce, but circumstances often change after divorce. If you are the custodial parent and plan to relocate, Indiana law, which changed in 2006, requires you to provide notice to your ex-spouse so he has an opportunity to object to the move.

How to Divorce in California & Leave the State With Children

A divorce represents an opportunity for spouses to move on. Often, this results in relocation to another town or state. However, if the couple has minor children that will be affected by the move, California courts are tasked with balancing the rights of parents to live where they desire against the welfare of the children in making custody determinations.

Pennsylvania Laws on Third Parties & Child Custody

In Pennsylvania, parents have a right to spend time with their child after a divorce. This may be at odds, however, with members of either parent's family who believe that they are in a better position to care for the child than the child's own parents. Knowing how courts in Pennsylvania treat requests by non-parent "third parties" will reduce some of the uncertainty in your custody dispute.

Related articles

If You Get Divorced in Georgia Can You Move to a Different State With Your Kids?

Before 2003, Georgia was one of the more lenient states when allowing a custodial parent to move away or relocate with ...

Parental Custody Rights When Moving Out of the State of PA

The issue of parental relocation is one of the most emotionally charged in custody law. No matter which way a court ...

Rights for a Divorced Father When the Mother Wants to Move Away

Parents aren't always equal under the law. In many divorce cases, courts name one parent as the primary custodian of ...

Can a Divorced Mother Move out of the State of Indiana With Her Children?

The terms of an Indiana court order for custody often affect whether a mother can move away from the state with her ...

Browse by category
Ready to Begin? GET STARTED